Search for: All records

Abstract. Satellite cloud observations have become an indispensable tool for evaluatinggeneral circulation models (GCMs). To facilitate the satellite and GCMcomparisons, the CFMIP (Cloud Feedback Model Inter-comparison Project)Observation Simulator Package (COSP) has been developed and is nowincreasingly used in GCM evaluations. Real-world clouds and precipitation canhave significant sub-grid variations, which, however, are often ignored oroversimplified in the COSP simulation. In this study, we use COSP cloudsimulations from the Super-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model (SPCAM5)and satellite observations from the Moderate Resolution ImagingSpectroradiometer (MODIS) and CloudSat to demonstrate the importance ofconsidering the sub-grid variability of cloud and precipitation when usingthe COSP to evaluate GCM simulations. We carry out two sensitivity tests:SPCAM5 COSP and SPCAM5-Homogeneous COSP. In the SPCAM5 COSP run, the sub-gridcloud and precipitation properties from the embeddedcloud-resolving model (CRM) of SPCAM5 are used to drive the COSP simulation, while inthe SPCAM5-Homogeneous COSP run only grid-mean cloud and precipitationproperties (i.e., no sub-grid variations) are given to the COSP. We find thatthe warm rain signatures in the SPCAM5 COSP run agree with the MODIS andCloudSat observations quite well. In contrast, the SPCAM5-Homogeneous COSPrun which ignores the sub-grid cloud variations substantially overestimatesthe radar reflectivity and probability of precipitation compared to thesatellite observations, as well as the results from the SPCAM5 COSP run. Thesignificant differences between the two COSP runs demonstrate that it isimportant to take into account the sub-grid variations of cloud andprecipitation when using COSP to evaluate the GCM to avoid confusing andmisleading results.